Thank you for this analysis of the abuse of the pardon power. I really appreciate you highlighting that this must only be used by a president with character. Obviously, that is not remotely true today. In fact, it would be laughable if it weren't so horrific.
I still do not understand the legality of the Supreme courts decision on presidential immunity. The statutes seem very clear, in word and intent, and as far as I can see, SCOTUS is not allowed to create or alter existing constitutional law. That is for Congress alone. This was not an interpretive dance, and there was no misleading language in article 2 about immunity for Congress or the President. Can this be rescinded, as this seems to be a clear breach of the fiduciary responsibility of SCOTUS ?
"What a tangle web that the court does weave when it teaches government how to deceive" Clark Neily, a Constitutional litigator also wrote an excellent article printed on Cato.org about the US Supreme Courts' "Lies, Damn Lies, Rational Review at Sea" dated December 4, 2025. I recommend you pair reading Lisa's excellent essay along with it. As a non-attorney I found Neily's article/blog enlightening as it was very troubling.
We have got to find a way to stop a blatantly corrupt and partisan Supreme Court majority - their decisions have allowed the corrupt Trump administration to enact the project 2025 objectives and given immunity to a mob boss president
Thank you for this analysis of the abuse of the pardon power. I really appreciate you highlighting that this must only be used by a president with character. Obviously, that is not remotely true today. In fact, it would be laughable if it weren't so horrific.
I still do not understand the legality of the Supreme courts decision on presidential immunity. The statutes seem very clear, in word and intent, and as far as I can see, SCOTUS is not allowed to create or alter existing constitutional law. That is for Congress alone. This was not an interpretive dance, and there was no misleading language in article 2 about immunity for Congress or the President. Can this be rescinded, as this seems to be a clear breach of the fiduciary responsibility of SCOTUS ?
Roberts created this amoral monster!
SCOTUS. Can we just call them what they are, Trump Court. Like Trump, they have no respect for the Constitution.
Aloha. From the COCONUT WIRELESS.......................full of SH*T ... GOP (Guardians of pedos)
"What a tangle web that the court does weave when it teaches government how to deceive" Clark Neily, a Constitutional litigator also wrote an excellent article printed on Cato.org about the US Supreme Courts' "Lies, Damn Lies, Rational Review at Sea" dated December 4, 2025. I recommend you pair reading Lisa's excellent essay along with it. As a non-attorney I found Neily's article/blog enlightening as it was very troubling.
Roberts looks like a puppy dog waiting for a biscuit!
We have got to find a way to stop a blatantly corrupt and partisan Supreme Court majority - their decisions have allowed the corrupt Trump administration to enact the project 2025 objectives and given immunity to a mob boss president
Grave Injustice indeed thank you for the information feed